 Wysłany: Nie Paź 20, 2024 9:24 am Temat postu: FGDAS |
|
| Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work! milan69 | |
| Wysłany: Pią Sty 06, 2023 7:34 pm Temat postu: famous world travelers |
|
| I don’t suppose many of websites give this kind of information.
us travel bloggers, famous world travelers, places to visit in ecuador, hotels in guayaquil ecuador |
|
| Wysłany: Sro Sty 04, 2023 8:17 am Temat postu: kolorowy sweter |
|
| Therefore some time gruby kardigan damski ago an "Open Source" movement spurted from unknown sources to add non-GPL licenses which would neutralize exactly the hated "viral" nature of GPL. Many do not recognize to this day that the idea behind that was to kill GPL, not to expand the falsely named "Open Source" movement.5. Now Ubuntu szar, this very Mark Shattleworth, if I got the story correctly, blessed Mono for bundling with their Linux distro, and for the sake of truly unnecessary "personal productivity" i.e. trifle applications. And the lemmings squeak indignantly when RMS warns of the possible trojaning of Linux with MS technologies.
The GPL got the idea started in a serious way. I most definitely don't dispute that as I was there as it gained momentum. I think one thing Daniel was examining in the original post from my read is what's happening today. Companies have become varying levels of partners, stewards, contributors and yes, leaches across the ope czerwony sweter damski n source spectrum. As the understanding of the licenses, community and derivative effects evolves, participation and the nature of the communities is changing. The polarization that was present in the original manifesto of the GPL and that is still present in the ideology is not so clear cut. lines of "i usually prefe sweter damski długi r x but these are the circumstances under which i'll use y"; it's not a zero-sum game, each of these three licence categories are producing tremendous results and together they are greater than the sum of their partsAn earlier commenter made the point that 90% of WordPress' customers don't care what the license is. I'd say that's accurate for 90% of the people using any open source project. They don't care as long as free remains "free, as in cost." They aren't looking at the code, they don't know what GPL is, much less what it entails. But the 10% left does. given that the argumen szary kardigan t we're having involves comparing the amount of collaboration happening over each software project. What is "collaboration", other than having many disparate companies using and contributing to your source code? Should we compare the number of patches from outside companies to each? I think we both know that Linux comes up winning in every metric. If the amount of collaboration happening is something you're indifferent to, are you perhaps answering a different question than the one Daniel's post has raised?Maybe you don't want to use popularity as your major criteria for sucess. So the truth is, there's a GOB of cross-pollination between the two. OpenBSD is a bit different, but OpenBSD has a different set of criteria than the other BSDs and Linux: Security, Security, Security. Oh, did I mention Security? So you can probably get away more with looking at OpenBSD separately than the others, but the idea that you can completely separate the other BSD's and Linux is insane.Oh, okay, that makes more sense. I contribute to X, and would prefer it to be under the GPL instead of BSD, because there are regular instances of companies taking the X code and producing non-free work on top of it. And for other work, having the choice of who to take that car t kolorowy sweter o is important to me. Ditto for software.I think Daniel's actually making a more subtle point than "the GPL is unpopular", though — he's saying that, even though most free software projects use the GPL, they might be getting more contributions if they didn't. Since 99% of the software industry currently thinks that free software in all forms is crazy, the argument goes, that's a large pool of developers who might contribute to free software if they weren't being put off by all the presence of all the people who requir  e that their donated code shouldn't turn into non-free code later. |
|